The IELTS Institute
Skip to main content

IELTS General Training · Work, migration and PR

IELTS General Training, where every mark counts more.

The texts are easier than Academic — and the band scale is harsher to compensate. You need 30 out of 40 in Reading for band 6.0, where an Academic candidate would already be on 7.0. Practising against the wrong table gives you false confidence.

IELTS General Training answer sheet with a verification stamp

Score scale

6.0
Band 0Band 9

The same 30 out of 40 that earns 7.0 on Academic is 6.0 here. Above band 7.0 the scale tightens to one wrong answer per half band.

Score scale
0–9 bands
Reading
Everyday & workplace texts
Writing Task 1
Write a letter
30 of 40 in Reading
Band 6.0
Length
~2h 45m + speaking

Who sits it

Choosing the wrong one wastes weeks.

Work visa, migration and permanent residency

Take this test if you are

  • Permanent residency and migration — Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the UK
  • UK visas and immigration, where the required band is often 4.0–6.0 per skill
  • Secondary education and work experience programmes
  • Training below degree level

Not sure? Your university, employer or immigration authority specifies which one they accept. Check before you book — they are not interchangeable.

Test structure

What you sit, in order.

Listening, Reading and Writing are taken in one sitting with no break. Speaking may be on the same day or up to a week either side.

Listening

~30 minutes · 40 questions

Same as Academic

Four parts, increasing in difficulty. Identical to Academic. The audio plays once — no pausing, no replay, no going back.

Reading

60 minutes · 40 questions

Differs from Academic

Section 1 social survival — notices, advertisements, timetables. Section 2 workplace survival — contracts, staff handbooks. Section 3 one longer text of general interest.

Writing

60 minutes · 2 tasks

Differs from Academic

Task 1 is a letter of at least 150 words, and tone is assessed. Task 2 is a 250+ word essay counting for twice as much.

Speaking

11–14 minutes · 3 parts

Same as Academic

Interview, a long turn from a cue card with one minute to prepare, then an abstract discussion. Identical to Academic.

The task that separates the two tests

Task 1 — write a letter

You are given a situation and asked to write a letter of at least 150 words. Getting the register wrong — writing casually to a manager, or stiffly to a friend — is penalised directly under Task Achievement.

What you may be asked for

  • Formal — to a manager, council or company you do not know
  • Semi-formal — to a landlord, colleague or neighbour
  • Informal — to a friend or family member
  • Requesting information
  • Making a complaint
  • Apologising or explaining
  • Applying for something

Every submission is scored on Task Achievement, Coherence & Cohesion, Lexical Resource, and Grammatical Range & Accuracy — separately, each worth a quarter, each with its own explanation quoting your own sentences.

Reading band scale

How General Training Reading is actually scored.

Notice how tight the top of this scale is. One wrong answer costs you half a band between 40 and 36. There is very little room at band 7.0 and above.

0123456789

30 correct out of 40 on General Training = band 6.0

Correct answersBand
409.0
398.5
37–388.0
367.5
34–357.0
32–336.5
30–316.0
27–295.5
23–265.0

Indicative conversion. Exact tables vary slightly by test version — ours are versioned per test and pinned to your result.

Question types

Every type you will meet, drillable on its own.

When your review shows you lost six marks on True / False / Not Given, you practise only that — rather than sitting another full test and hoping.

Multiple choice
True / False / Not Given
Yes / No / Not Given
Matching information
Matching headings
Matching features
Sentence completion
Summary completion
Note, table & flow-chart completion
Diagram label completion
Short-answer questions

Sit a full General Training mock this week.

The free plan includes one full mock every month, marked against the General Training band table, with a question-by-question review.