The IELTS Institute
Skip to main content

IELTS Academic · University and professional registration

IELTS Academic, practised the way it is actually sat.

Three dense passages in sixty minutes with no transfer time. A Task 1 that asks you to describe data, not write a letter. And a Reading band scale that is more forgiving than General Training — which is exactly why you should never practise on the wrong one.

IELTS Academic answer sheet with a verification stamp

Score scale

7.0
Band 0Band 9

30 correct out of 40 in Reading is band 7.0 here — the same 30 is only 6.0 on General Training. One paper, two tables.

Score scale
0–9 bands
Reading
3 academic passages
Writing Task 1
Describe a visual
30 of 40 in Reading
Band 7.0
Length
~2h 45m + speaking

Who sits it

Choosing the wrong one wastes weeks.

University and professional registration

Take this test if you are

  • Undergraduate and postgraduate study at an English-speaking university
  • Professional registration — medicine, nursing, engineering, accountancy
  • Institutions that require evidence of academic English

Not sure? Your university, employer or immigration authority specifies which one they accept. Check before you book — they are not interchangeable.

Test structure

What you sit, in order.

Listening, Reading and Writing are taken in one sitting with no break. Speaking may be on the same day or up to a week either side.

Listening

~30 minutes · 40 questions

Same as General Training

Four parts, increasing in difficulty. Identical to General Training. The audio plays once — no pausing, no replay, no going back.

Reading

60 minutes · 40 questions

Differs from General Training

Three long passages taken from journals, books and newspapers, at least one carrying a detailed logical argument. No extra time to transfer answers.

Writing

60 minutes · 2 tasks

Differs from General Training

Task 1 describes a visual in 150+ words. Task 2 is a 250+ word essay and counts for twice as much. Suggested split: 20 minutes, then 40.

Speaking

11–14 minutes · 3 parts

Same as General Training

Interview, a long turn from a cue card with one minute to prepare, then an abstract discussion. Identical to General Training.

The task that separates the two tests

Task 1 — describe what the data shows

You are given a visual and asked to summarise and report the main features in at least 150 words. You are never asked for your opinion, and inventing reasons for the trend costs you marks under Task Achievement.

What you may be asked for

  • Line graph — change over time
  • Bar chart — comparison across categories
  • Pie chart — proportion
  • Table — mixed data
  • Process diagram — stages of a cycle
  • Map — change to a place over time
  • Two sources combined in one task

Every submission is scored on Task Achievement, Coherence & Cohesion, Lexical Resource, and Grammatical Range & Accuracy — separately, each worth a quarter, each with its own explanation quoting your own sentences.

Reading band scale

How Academic Reading is actually scored.

Academic Reading is scored more generously than General Training. 30 correct answers is band 7.0 here and band 6.0 on General Training.

0123456789

30 correct out of 40 on Academic = band 7.0

Correct answersBand
39–409.0
37–388.5
35–368.0
33–347.5
30–327.0
27–296.5
23–266.0
19–225.5
15–185.0

Indicative conversion. Exact tables vary slightly by test version — ours are versioned per test and pinned to your result.

Question types

Every type you will meet, drillable on its own.

When your review shows you lost six marks on True / False / Not Given, you practise only that — rather than sitting another full test and hoping.

Multiple choice
True / False / Not Given
Yes / No / Not Given
Matching information
Matching headings
Matching features
Matching sentence endings
Sentence completion
Summary completion
Note, table & flow-chart completion
Diagram label completion
Short-answer questions

Sit a full Academic mock this week.

The free plan includes one full mock every month, marked against the Academic band table, with a question-by-question review.